At 12:33 AM 6/6/01 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >>Maybe if someone makes a proper case the matter can be re-voted. Was the >>original vote based on some very strong arguments or was just a go with flow >>kind of vote? I really have no recollection. > >IIRC it was vetoed by Conor because it was too generic and didn't buildfile >user anything (only task file writer) - at least that was I believe the >reason. I kinda agree with it too.
TYPO - > IIRC it was vetoed by Conor because it was too generic and didn't buildfile user anything (only task writer) - at least that was I believe the reason. I kinda agree with it too. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
