A gree with the suggestion of having the Logos grouped in the cases they are small variants of the same idea. Some of the variants seem to be just a different contrast color or a "built by" text.
I suggest we first allow for deciding on a particular family of logos and then can have a quick vote on the specific one if the winner has more than one version in the family. Jose Alberto > -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:01 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [VOTE] Logo Decision process > > > Hi all! > > I think we have enough, particulary VERY NICE, ANT LOGO > Proposals and it is > really time to decide on one as our official ANT Logo. Here > are the tasks > and the timeschedule I am thinking of! > > END OF PROPOSAL PHASE: > ====================== > When: 19th August 2001 (Sunday THIS WEEK!) > > ASSINGNING A UNIQE ID TO EVERY LOGO: > ==================================== > Descr: Adding a column for the key to the Logo table (first > column). The > keys should be something like: #001, #002 etc. > When: ASAP (Stefan, could you please - the FireWall, and I've still > promlems with cvs-login from home :-()! > > INFORM ANT-USER AFTER WE DECIDED ON THIS PROCESS: > ================================================= > After this vote. > > VOTING PHASE: > ============= > Voters: IMHO only the ant-dev and ant-user mailing list > members should have > the right to vote. Oh - I'd include the Apache officials as well ;-)! > When: from 20th August to September 9th 2001 > How: > 1. I'll offer a private mail account for that purpose - or we > could use an > apache mail account - thougts?!? > 2. Additionally I'll over myself to count the votes and store > the result in > a (html-)spreadsheet. > 3. Everybody should have up to 3 votes on 3 different LOGOS. > Just one vote > per voter, per logo! > 4. If we have the same number of votes on more then one logo > there will be > another voting-phase just including the winners of the first vote! > 5. After the voting phase I'd propose just to make the > winners nubers of > votes public - not the loosers ;-). > > > THINGS THAT ARE UNCLEAR: > ======================== > How can I get a list of the mail-adresses of the list-members > to filter > invalid votes? > Which mail-account to take for the vote process. > > > > To start the vote here is my > > +1 on the complete process except the topics wich havbe to be > discussed! > > > Cheers, > Chris >
