so, can I still mail in a logo sunday night? or when is the exact deadline?
Thank you, Joris Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > Feel free, to arrange groups, then! I do NOT want to have the responsibility > for the groups. Generally I'd -0 the group-topic for I have some concerns, > but I do not veto at all! > > One thing is important to me: We should speed up with the decision project, > to make shure, that we do not lose the logo contributers, because they might > think, that we aren't interested in a logo anymore! An IMHO we need these > contributers after we decided on a logo, because we might need other > versions of the logo: smaller, bigger version, "build by" versions, > vectoriced versions for beeing printed in mags or adds or apache-T-shirts > ;-) and version I can't think of ATM! > > Cheers, > Chris > > > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Regarding the families of logos: > > > In some cases its easy to find groups, but in some it isn't. > > > I really do not > > > want to decide to group them... For instance there are 2 > > > similar logos with > > > gray and red and a big ANT on it (from Rubus). I really like > > > the first one, > > > but dislike the second one. what vote should i give, if they > > > are in the same > > > family! Due to that reason I'd -0.5 the "families-idea" > > > > I do not see the problem you have with the family round of > > votes. What has > > been suggested is to have a first round where we pick a > > family and then a > > second round to pick ONE of the logos from the winning > > family. A family will > > be constitutes only by logos of the same submitter that have SMALL > > variations between them (colors, additional text, etc). There > > are several > > logos that can be easily cathegorized that way. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
