On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would prefer (1) if we made it a normal target.
Which would be the old unmodified "no tasks outside of targets" which received a -1 by Conor ... > I still think things that effect the processing of build file > (import statements and aspect uses) should be at the top level as > that is the only way we can make ant easy to pre-process/validate > the build file. So we'd be left with constructs that are not tasks (or privileged tasks or whatever we'd decide to call them) that could live at the top level - and still have the problem how to identify them. (2) and (3) would work for this, (1) doesn't, right? Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
