On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:38, Peter Donald wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:17, Conor MacNeill wrote: > > In my view we should either > > > > 1. not bother deprecating things since we will never remove them > > 2. deprecate things to encourage better usage but not remove them > > +1
I should modify that to "deprecate things to encourage better usage but not remove them" unless they inhibit growth of ant and have been deprecated for a number of releases or were completely broken to begin with and unlikely people used them. > > > 3. deprecate things and remove after at least one release of being > > deprecated. > > > > All IMHO, of course -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | For those who refuse to understand, no explanation | | will ever suffice. For those who refuse to believe, | | no evidence will ever suffice. | *-----------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
