From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > What I am saying is to modify the thing so that <param> means the
> > same thing everywhere (<ant> and <antcall>).
>
> Which meant that <param> on <antcall> in Ant 1.5 would behave
> different from the one in 1.4.1 - no way.
>
I am not removing any meaning from <param> I am just suggesting
to add new attributes, which never existed before and hence cannot
possibly affect people's 1.4 files.
<fileset id="blah.id" .... />
<antcall ... >
<param name="x" value="foo" /> <!-- property -->
<param name="y" refid="blah.id" /> <!-- reference -->
</antcall>
> > I am not saying it is wrong for them to be evaluated in the context
> > of their original Project
>
> After thinking about it again, it seems that passing clones (with the
> new project as a reference) would be the way to go - otherwise changes
> made to the referenced objects in the subbuild would change the
> objects in the parent build at the same time.
>
No, no, no. That would break backward compatibility. There is no guarantee
other peoples <datatypes> implement clonable appropriately. :-)
Jose Alberto
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
