On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not removing any meaning from <param> I am just suggesting > to add new attributes, which never existed before and hence cannot > possibly affect people's 1.4 files. <antcall>'s <param> is a Property task that will be run in the context of the new project. <property> *has* a refid attribute > <param name="y" refid="blah.id" /> <!-- reference --> would call toString on the referenced FileSet and assign its value to a user property named y in the new project. > From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> After thinking about it again, it seems that passing clones (with >> the new project as a reference) would be the way to go > > No, no, no. That would break backward compatibility. There is no > guarantee other peoples <datatypes> implement clonable > appropriately. :-) I've seen the smiley, but hey, you are correct 8-) My implementation tries to call clone now and copies the original object if clone fails. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
