There's actually a fairly good argument for not including it into the Ant
distribution, since otherwise that offers the precedent that somehow Ant
should contain tasks for every vendor and open-source product on the planet.
Since a JOnAS Ant task would only be of interest to JOnAS developers, why
not simply ship said task with JOnAS? Why does it need to ship with Ant?
Ted Neward
{.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, DevelopMentor
(http://www.develop.com)
http://www.javageeks.com/tneward
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cyrille Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:21 PM
Subject: JOnAS integration into Jakarta/ANT
>
> Hello JOnAS and ANT users !
>
> Jakarta/Ant commiters are not very motivated to included the new JOnAS
> ejbjar task into Ant distribution.
>
> I have a message to people who think the new ejb deployment task is cool :
> Could you vote for the improvement on Bugzilla ?
> Maybe it will help the commiters ...
>
> Follow the procedure :
>
> In first create bugzilla account :
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/createaccount.cgi
>
> And go to :
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6059
>
> And vote for the bug !!!
> ( quick link
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showvotes.cgi?voteon=6059 )
>
> Thank you very much !
>
> You can also send a message to the mailing list "
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "
>
> --
> Cyrille Morvan
> IT Student - FiiFo - University Paris-Sud
> Ant : http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/
> JOnAS http://www.objectweb.org/jonas/
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
