DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 patch to junit and touch task: junit task now wont fail on non-junit test, touch now provides the same timestamp for all files when operating on a fileset ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-06 21:09 ------- Noted, thanks for the clarification. Believe it or not I *knew* that already... but wasn't thinking straight earlier. Anyway, the main point is that <junit> dies if it hits classes that aren't true JUnit tests (from the definition Stephane provided). It'd be nicer if it just ignored (but warned when skipping) classes that JUnit didn't like.... much like <javac> doesn't croak on non-.java files. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
