DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956 patch to junit and touch task: junit task now wont fail on non-junit test, touch now provides the same timestamp for all files when operating on a fileset ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-06 21:49 ------- I don't want <junit> to get a failure if it hits classes that are not valid tests. You wouldn't want <javac> to fail if it finds a .properties file, right? Same idea. Its not a huge deal, but something that seems useful to avoid having to worry about test case naming conventions and using patternsets to only include those. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
