On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:02, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> In the very first place, I'm with Adam here, roles just reflect >> that there will be more pluggable things than just tasks and data >> types in later version of the descriptor. A way to [...] >> avoid hard coded names in the parser. > > Can you explain? Without roles, we need a parser for the descriptor that has the String "task" and "data-type" hard coded into it and need to patch it when we want to add new pluggable things. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
