From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > It is just if people have their own tasks that make bad assumptions > > about things in CLASSPATH. > > "bad" but correct assumptions, yes, for Ant 1.4.1 anyway. > > > Now if that is not extremely bizzar(sp?) I am waiting for someone to > > explain me the logic of that. > > Jose Alberto, you don't need to convince anybody that Ant 1.4.1 class > loading behavior is broken. We just cannot repair it without breaking > systems that relied on this broken behavior - and it has been broken > long enough that we cannot say "oops, a bug, we've fixed it" IMHO. >
But you can still get exactly the broken behaviour back if you so require. So what the heck is the problem. > > Are we using the TreadContextClassLoader properly on those tasks? > > Probably not, need to check. > > > Yes, maybe in a JVM1.1 you may need to put more things in the > > CLASSPATH but hey, you have to give people some reason to update ;-) > > If they can - I'd love to run OpenBSD instead of Linux on my servers What better way to have a compelling reason for the OpenBSD people to do their job and provide a the JVMs that are needed. :-) In any case, since you get exactly the same behaviour as today by putting everything in lib, so this is a non-issue. Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
