On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > > I would prefer you write a new <taskdef/> that worked with whatever rules > > you wanted to use and used your own adapter rather than growing ants base > > adapter > > This is a simple extension to the 'base' adapter.
So would be adding ability to call init() and destroy() methods. As would be adding a whole slew of things. I mean even an <if/> task is really a simple thing ma it no appear in the ant source. > Adding a new Taskdef and a new TaskAdapter will just cause confusion > and mess - and will be difficult to keep in sync with the original. For you it causes confusion perhaps but it makes things easier for the average users. -- Cheers, Pete "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit." -- Maugham -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
