On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'll commit a different change that makes > Project.createTask() use a TaskFactory - and that will allow > user code ( i.e. external tasks ) to plug in a different TaskAdapter.
I don't think that is desirable either. What is your problem of defining your own Taskdef task. Rather than extend the core add a new task. Extending the core adds to the cost of maintaining the system while new tasks that aren't in ant CVS doesn't. > BTW, it seems that a pluggable TaskFactory will also solve > the ClassLoader problem ( at least for me ) - since the plugin > can implement whatever policy it wants. So could a task. > P.S.: all this discussion on ClassLoader and TaskAdapter > is just another good argument why the so-called 'ant2 as > a new codebase' idea is fundamentally wrong - I haven't seen this kind > of review and debate going into any of the proposals, So have you ever participated in any of the Ant2 discussions? -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------- We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality. ------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
