Erik and Stefan: So, talking to both of you, it sounds like the correct solution would be for me to un-patch my FileSet and PatternSet, then patch JavaDoc and Jar.
In doing so, I still would like to be using a single list of package names instead of filenames. If the PatternSet is not to be used this way, perhaps I should just extend it and supply a different classname (PackageSet?). In addition, looking at the Javadoc source, it seems that it allows passing a single packagename or a comma-delimited list of package names. The plan, assuming I am on the right track this time, would be to add setPackages(PackageSet) or addPackages(PackageSet).... I would like some input on this before I revert the other stuff though, as the only difference between the PatternSet and a PackageSet would be to add mapping support to the PackageSet instead of the PatternSet like I did yesterday. Thanks, Malachi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
