----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ant Developers
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: Patternsets, Filesets, and Mapper
> Erik and Stefan:
>
> So, talking to both of you, it sounds like the correct solution would be
for me to
> un-patch my FileSet and PatternSet, then patch JavaDoc and Jar.
Yikes, I didn't realize I was still in this discussion! :)
To be honest, I'm not familiar with <javadoc> under the covers much, nor how
the command-line utility works (although I did dig in to find setUseExternal
to patch XDoclet's codebase with to fix a bug there!).
> I would like some input on this before I revert the other stuff though, as
the only
> difference between the PatternSet and a PackageSet would be to add mapping
support to the
> PackageSet instead of the PatternSet like I did yesterday.
There is a package Mapper that I created that is available too. I'm not
sure if that would be of help here, as you'd have to add support for mappers
to <javadoc>, but it converts file paths to dotted package names. I used it
for <uptodate> checks from test cases to their <junit> XML results (which
are filenames in a flat directory with package name in the filename). Does
that help this situation any?
Erik
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
