> Surely you don't need the bits that you can't compile, do you? Note that I 
> don't believe most committers can compile 
> all of Ant, either. Why not just compile the bits you need and use just those?

If it were just for my personal use, I would do it. But this is the version 
used by a large project.
It is already a concern that we are using Alpha due to patches needed for 
<ejbjar> and the like.
If then I have to change the version of ANT everytime someone decides to use 
some additional task
that is going to be a problem. I prefer a nightly build from GUMP that at least 
has all the parts
(or as much as possible in there).

Whould it be possible for ANT to tell which parts are off, something like

    ant -version
    Apache Ant version 1.5alpha compiled on March 10 2002
    Missing modules:
        this
        this
        and that

Then at least one would know what is not there. Just a thought.

Jose Alberto



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to