On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> > I don't think its quite that simple.... how would such a framework get
> > attribute values and such to reconstruct the XML? There are typically no
> > getters on Ant tasks to return back attributes and sub-elements.
> >
> > And also, keep in mind that an Ant task does not necessarily extend Task....
> > the only requirement to being an Ant task is implementing an execute()
> > method!
> >
> Very true.
>
> Notice that if we were to keep the syntactic information arround in
> RuntimeConfigurable
> like we discussed in the past. Then it would be very easy to do. Since the
> UnknownElement
> tree is all uninterpreted info.
Yes, and it would also save the original property ( with ${} in it ), not
the processed one.
( I have a very bad week, I'll commit some code for RuntimeConfigurable in
proposal as soon as I get free )
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
