----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:18 AM
Subject: Re: javadoc changes: have they broken xdoclet?
> On 30 Apr 2002, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> did you try doing a test run of our own xdoc proposal?
> >
> > Honestly, no. I'll try it.
>
> OK, I see where the problem is from javadoc's point of view - all
> files are specified as source files and all packages are specified as
> well, making javadoc barf because it parses the same sources twice.
>
> But now that I have tried to follow the full inheritance chain, I'm
> completely puzzled. <xdocs> inherits from a class in xdoclet which
> (indircetly) inherits from a class in xjavadoc which in turn inherits
> from <java> - our <javadoc> task is not involved at all as far as I
> can tell, so I don't see how any changes in it can break <xdoc>.
All the released versions of XDoclet use <javadoc> under the covers, but
they are now refactoring to use their new xjavadoc tool but have not
released yet.
Something in <javadoc> definitely broke this, as you've already figured out
from later e-mails. I'm seeing the problem on both xdocs proposal and my
own builds. We anxiously await your patch! :)
Erik
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
