I don't think we are referring to any external public static constants in the relevant tasks - so I would be tempted to say "No worries", but anyway, it is always nice to be cautious ;-)
Cheers, Magesh ********************************************** * Philosopher: A fool who torments himself * * during life, to be spoken of when dead. * ********************************************** ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Skeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Annoncement text for 1.5beta1 > >However, you shouldn't compile against the created dummies for > >actual binaries - the constants compiled into the classes may > >well be wrong. This is more to make sure that the classes > >*can* compile than for the classes themselves. > > Better than nothing ;) I'm not so sure about that - what if Ant ends up using the compile-time constant for DELETE instead of GET in something, for instance? Jon PS I think I do actually give the correct constant when I can, but I can't guarantee anything. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
