On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 02:58, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 13 Jun 2002, Timothy Halloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let me know if there is interest (or if I'm wasting my time:) > > Part of both 8-) > > Ant is generally supposed to be JDK 1.1 compatible, the classes in the > extension package are not (they require JDK 1.2 anyway). So the type > of refactoring you are doing can only be applied to a very small part > of Ant's code base. > > Stefan
Ahh, the changing shape of the Java language and libraries! So, the set of packages under *.ant.taskdefs.optional.* are worth looking at. Is there a document breaking out Ant packages and their mandated JDK level, or just "build.xml"? I am developing a tool that finds uses of concrete classes where Interfaces would be better and automatically and suggests them to the programmer. It is designed to help the increase the maintainability of Java software (e.g., better use of abstraction, robustness to change, and better representation of the actual requirements of the class or method). Take care, Tim -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
