On 14 Jun 2002, Timothy Halloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, the set of packages under *.ant.taskdefs.optional.* are worth > looking at.
Not all of them, but you seem to know that ... > Is there a document breaking out Ant packages and their mandated JDK > level, or just "build.xml"? Look at build.xml. If a class is not matched by the patternsets that make them require jdk1.2+ or even higher, don't touch them. > I am developing a tool that finds uses of concrete classes where > Interfaces would be better and automatically and suggests them to > the programmer. Sounds very useful. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
