On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:11, Adam Murdoch wrote: > > This would allow us work with a single deployer across whole runtime. > > This deployer would then access the TypeManager/RoleRegistry from > > TaskContext.getService() and it "feels" a lot nicer. > > > > Thoughts? > > I was thinking the same thing. Maybe ExecutionFrame would be a better > option than TaskContext?
I would prefer to couple onto TaskContext because thats a "stable" interface and it is available to all tasks. ExecutionFrame should only be accesed by "privlidged" tasks - not that we make any distinction at the moment ;) -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------------------------------ militant agnostic: i don't know, and you don't know either. ------------------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
