On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 09:30, Peter Donald wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:11, Adam Murdoch wrote: > > > This would allow us work with a single deployer across whole runtime. > > > This deployer would then access the TypeManager/RoleRegistry from > > > TaskContext.getService() and it "feels" a lot nicer. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > I was thinking the same thing. Maybe ExecutionFrame would be a better > > option than TaskContext? > > I would prefer to couple onto TaskContext because thats a "stable" > interface and it is available to all tasks.
Fair enough. Should we change Executor to use TaskContext as well, then? -- Adam -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
