DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10401>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10401 waitfor task doesn't shut off socket conditions in every case ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-02 20:36 ------- Actually it looks like I understood you, but you didn't understand that the meaning of my comment is to broaden the aplicability of this bug. The symptoms you describe could be expected from existing computers as well as ones that don't exist. Therefore this bug applies in even more cases than you are claiming. I agree with you :). I wasn't clear about that. I would agree that the behavior you describe in waitfor is counter-intuitive and ought to be fixed. By the way, your english is marvelous, the only thing I don't understand in your various posts is this s.th abreviation you keep using.... It almost looks like you are abbreviating the word something? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
