On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:35, Peter Donald wrote: > At 10:02 PM 7/4/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > The current > >DefaultProjectBuilder happens to have chosen dynamic assembly. And when > >gui's that want to get at the targets start appearing, then we can change > >DefaultProjectBuilder to do some static assembly. In the meantime, static > >assembly is kinda pointless - just adds inertia. > > Well at least two people were using static assembly and both of our apps > are now broken.
Doh! Ok, I will change DefaultProjectBuilder back. > If you want to experiment with dynamic assembly would you > mind using a separate ProjectBuilder or something? Sure. -- Adam -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
