At 10:01 AM 7/5/2002 +1000, you wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:35, Peter Donald wrote:
> At 10:02 PM 7/4/2002 +1000, you wrote:
> > The current
> >DefaultProjectBuilder happens to have chosen dynamic assembly. And when
> >gui's that want to get at the targets start appearing, then we can change
> >DefaultProjectBuilder to do some static assembly. In the meantime, static
> >assembly is kinda pointless - just adds inertia.
>
> Well at least two people were using static assembly and both of our apps
> are now broken.
Doh! Ok, I will change DefaultProjectBuilder back.
> If you want to experiment with dynamic assembly would you
> mind using a separate ProjectBuilder or something?
Sure.
woohoo!
Cheers,
Peter Donald
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind,
and proving that there is no need to do so - almost
everyone gets busy on the proof."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
