> MSJVM still kicks ass in performance after years but let's 
> face it it's not
> widely used in a professional development environment...

Unless you're using a multi-processor machine, then the MSJVM will only use
one processor.  Or, if you're dealing with lots of synchronization and lots
of threads, in which case the IBM 1.3.1 JVM rocks.

I just had to say it.  I spent too much time working on MSJVM.


-Matt
Try something new. 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to