----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephane Bailliez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:45 PM Subject: Re: death of a mutant
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Albrecht, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > MSJVM still kicks ass in performance after years but let's > > > face it it's not > > > widely used in a professional development environment... > > > > Unless you're using a multi-processor machine, then the MSJVM will only > use > > one processor. Or, if you're dealing with lots of synchronization and > lots > > of threads, in which case the IBM 1.3.1 JVM rocks. > > Clearly, but msjvm is lightweight and fast..for client side...which was > clearly what it was supposed to be at the beginning...something that was > supposed to be in your fridge or your cellular is now supposed to be the > defacto standard in a multiprocessor server and rule the e-Commerce > transactions.....mmm.... yeah, you can do a lot if you dont properly validate your arguments before you hand them off to the OS. Actually I still like its COM integration. Sure, it aint portable, but it works really well. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
