On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Diane Holt wrote: > > 1.x effort continues on, but only for > > a) bug fixes > > b) selected new tasks > > c) minor additions that make sense for 1.x > > I agree completely. That's why I said "maintenance releases of 1.5" rather > than "bug-fix releases" -- but if you want to introduce significant > changes (and, personally, I see the ATATT change as significant), then > it'd probably have to be 1.6. In any case, I definitely think it's time to > stop spinning our wheels on 2.0 and actually start making it happen.
I think we were making it happen already. There are few changes that are proposed, work is well under way - the only question is if we'll call it 1.6 or 2.0 or 3.0. And the name can only be set in a release plan - until this happen we just work on 'the main tree' and all changes are for 'the next major release of ant'. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
