--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any change requires a majority of votes. If a majority of ant commiters > believe that building on machines that have only JDK1.1 is not as > important as using new features in jdk1.2 - than I see no reasons not > to change it in 1.6.
But there is a reason -- we agreed (at some point, many moons ago) that anything called Ant1.x would be JDK1.1-compatible (BTW: I did mean that the first time around, and shouldn't have written it JDK1.x), and once we decided to break with that, we'd call it 2.0. Diane ===== ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
