Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter can propose another vote if he wants - but until this happens I consider the subject closed, ant will support targetless build files.
Actually Peter already did just that. It was vetoed ... much the same way that target-less build files was vetoed. Stefan reverted the change. It seems the rules change depending on who is doing the veto.
Peter, I agree with you about targetless buildfiles...
But I don't see why it really has to be vetoed. If users want to shoot themselves in the foot, let them do it.
Targetless buildfile support will not prevent us from using only targets, as in Java having static code snippets doesn't prevent one from writing correct methods.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
