Re: [VOTE] target-less build files

[Erik Hatcher]

Somehow this slipped through my usual careful radar of e-mails, and I 
apologize (switched to a new O/S and new e-mail client and the flood of 
e-mails has not stopped to let me catch my breath).  Is this vote still 
on the table?

I'm +0, if it still matters.  I really like having all tasks be 
available at the top-level, but it would not matter to my personal 
builds whether targets were optional as I'd still use them myself.

        Erik
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
after I've made these things possible, Peter has indicated that he
doesn't like them.  Honestly, target-less build files have been the
driving force for me to tackle the "tasks outside of targets" part and
I would have liked an early indicator as I've said what I'd be doing
quite clearly several times, but hey ...
Here we go.
I like target-less build files as an easy entry for newbies as well as
a stripped down process for very simple things (Ant's own docs.xml
could perfectly be stated without targets at all).
+1 to target-less build files.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>