----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Atherton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Compare that to the cost for Subversion users of leaving it out of Ant > proper. Retrieving code from SCM systems is core to performing builds, > which is why we support such a variety of them. If a Subversion task is not > part of Ant, everyone who wants to use it has to find the task class in > their Subversion installation and include a <taskdef> with the appropriate > classpath. We couldn't easily share build files with Subversion tasks > because the classpath would have to be stored in a separate property that > changed for each user. Not a huge hurdle, but a barrier to adoption of > Subversion that seems unnecessary. No. If we want to externalize tasks it's based not only on the maintenance burden but also because we assume things like Antlib will be in. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
