On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > Beeing able to do <taskdef> with an explicit classpath ( instead of > putting all the jars in ant/lib ) is a benefit. And you don't need > to use the classname - you can just have a resource with all the > task ( META-INF/subversion.tasks ). > > That would make your task available to existing ant1.5 (and 1.4) users and > you'll be able to make changes independent of the long ant release > cycle.
Hypothetically speaking, if the code were to be hosted outside of the ant tree, would it still be OK to be in the package "org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs"? The AbstractCVSTask class is a fairly nice base to adapt, but there are accessibility issues if it's moved outside the package. Regards Kieran -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
