On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:02, Erik Hatcher wrote: > My bottleneck is XDoclet these days, even though its faster now than > ever and the latest version does much much better dependency checking > too. And even that being said, its not slow.
You may want to have a look at qdox.sourceforge.net. If you are doing fairly straight transforms (like the stuff you do with antdocs proposal) then it is a much nicer toolkit to work with and a fair bit faster too. After having XDoclet break my code for the umpteenth time, I decided to give it a go. I was skeptical at first (XDoclet rocks) but actually playing with it led me to like QDox more in my use cases (basically extracting metadata from classes and putting xml files). Anyways it is fairly nice and much easier to support than xdoclet. However if you are doing code generation XDoclet is probably still the one to use unless you want to try vdoclet (which apparently uses qdox + velocity for code generation). I haven't used vdoclet though ... -- Cheers, Peter Donald *----------------------------------------------------------* The phrase "computer literate user" really means the person has been hurt so many times that the scar tissue is thick enough so he no longer feels the pain. -- Alan Cooper, The Inmates are Running the Asylum *----------------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
