On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:50, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > You may want to have a look at qdox.sourceforge.net. If you are doing > > fairly straight transforms (like the stuff you do with antdocs proposal) > > then it is a much nicer toolkit to work with and a fair bit faster too. > > Yeah, that would be worth considering for the proposal/xdocs stuff. But > on a positive note, the XDoclet team is working with the qdox folks to > get the best of both worlds. I'm not sure where this currently stands, > but I've seen some discussions on the xdoclet list.
kool. > > Anyways it is fairly nice and much easier to support than xdoclet. > > However if you are doing code generation XDoclet is probably still the > > one to use unless you want to try vdoclet (which apparently uses qdox + > > velocity for code generation). I haven't used vdoclet though ... > > On another positive note - XDoclet is rapidly moving towards having a > Velocity templating engine under the covers. Woohoo! Been hearing about this for 6 months. Glad it's finally happening ;) > I'm doing tons of code generation using the XDoclet features and its > actually working very very nicely - my last message was not a negative > against XDoclet, more a positive that I'm relying on it so heavily and > that it happens to be used much more than <javac> :) yup ;) -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------------------------- To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting. - Sun Tzu, 300 B.C. ------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
