On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Jon Skeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still don't have any well-defined idea of what the effect the > resolution would actually have,
I'm not sure anybody has a complete picture yet. What I see: * Ant's PMC would now become legally responsible for Ant's code-base instead of the Jakarta PMC. * All Ant committers can become PMC members (at least of the initial PMC). * According to Roy (and backed by other board members), only PMC members are legally protected by the ASF - so with the point above, we can cover all committers. Well, cover as good as the ASF can do, that is. > I think there are at least three reasonable categories: currently > active, remain what they are - and can become PMC members if they want to. > currently inactive but with some intention of becoming active in the > future, emeritus committers? > and currently inactive with no real continuing interest in Ant. emeritus committers or no committers at all - at their choice. The "no committers at all" option would probably apply to a lot of the committers inherited from Tomcat almost three years ago who have never realized they had become Ant committers. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
