Jon Skeet wrote:
> Right. I'd be very happy to have some trimming, but I don't think that > active/inactive is necessarily the best place to draw the line. I think > there are at least three reasonable categories: currently active, > currently inactive but with some intention of becoming active in the > future, and currently inactive with no real continuing interest in Ant. > I'd class myself as the middle category myself, and that's obviously the > difficult category to decide upon in terms of whether or not they should > still be committers :) The second category is quite easy to decide - they should remain committers ( maybe placed in 'emeritus state', from which it's trivial to change back). The third may be a bit more difficult - if we also consider those who have no real continuing interest, but made some major contributions ( like writing ant in the first place :-). Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
