----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [DD] I like this abstraction. But would it work with a mapper that returned > several files to check dirty status given the proposed single object > signtature? Good point. But since the parameter is of type Object, that *can* potentially even take in arrays. IOW, the current signature does not prevent one from passing in an array as argument. Agreed, it is not neat enough. > [DD] I don't like that name personally. TargetObject seems designed > exclusively for SourceFileScanner, and thus should relate to it by name. > Something like SourceFileItem? This should not apply to files alone; The Target may be anything, not necessarily a File, though in this case, it happens to be. Item is pedantic. Cheers, Magesh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
