Most of the posts on this thread were political instead of technical. And IMHO, I only saw a few posts that got close to the real point. J# is more FUD than a threat to Java 2, as it is aimed at the legacy Java 1.1 code that some Microsoft customers might want to bundle into .NET projects. Until the CLR gets ported widely outside Win32, it poses no threeat to the JRE (although the argument is probably more complicated than that).
The real horse at the other end of the tail is: Could Ant be used to build .NET assemblies? Here's a rad idea: could you use Ant as a replacement for (the build part of) Visual Studio .NET? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
