> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> ...
> I consider Ant 1.5Beta1 "release" quality, personally. So
> far there have
> been no show-stopper issues and we are encouraging everyone
> to upgrade so
> that we can get it thoroughly hammered before it goes to
> release.
Does the Ant project have a policy on which version of the
documentation should be the (default) documentation on the
web site? If not, it probably should (so it's not a question
of who people considers it release-quality or not released yet).
> Because
> of this, I'm happy to see that the website now has the
> 1.5Beta1 docs online.
Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting that the new documentation
shouldn't be on the web site, just that it shouldn't replace the
documentation for the current (last released) version.
You could do it the way Sun does: The documentation for JDK 1.2
and JDK 1.3 was (and is) still accessible (without downloading and
unpacking)on their web site when 1.4beta and then 1.4.0 came out.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
