Ok, I agree! :)
I just don't have the bandwidth right now to take care of something like
that myself. Perhaps if someone else wants to chip in to make it happen
this way then I'd support it.
Erik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Barclay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: Ant 1.5 Beta documentation online
>
>
> > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > ...
> > I consider Ant 1.5Beta1 "release" quality, personally. So
> > far there have
> > been no show-stopper issues and we are encouraging everyone
> > to upgrade so
> > that we can get it thoroughly hammered before it goes to
> > release.
>
> Does the Ant project have a policy on which version of the
> documentation should be the (default) documentation on the
> web site? If not, it probably should (so it's not a question
> of who people considers it release-quality or not released yet).
>
>
>
> > Because
> > of this, I'm happy to see that the website now has the
> > 1.5Beta1 docs online.
>
> Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting that the new documentation
> shouldn't be on the web site, just that it shouldn't replace the
> documentation for the current (last released) version.
>
> You could do it the way Sun does: The documentation for JDK 1.2
> and JDK 1.3 was (and is) still accessible (without downloading and
> unpacking)on their web site when 1.4beta and then 1.4.0 came out.
>
>
>
>
> Daniel
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
