Alexander,
Just two things before additional answers beginning of next week: - We've already explained that there's no additional "extraordinary power" given to the RIPE NCC via this proposal: the very potential possibility of an LIR closure exists in the current policies (cf. my message dated 24th January) - You've the right not to agree, that's something I respect. That's not a reason to judge presentations "funny" or proposals "as theater"... Regards Hervé -----Message d'origine----- De : anti-abuse-wg [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-boun...@ripe.net] De la part de Alexander Isavnin Envoyé : samedi 17 février 2018 18:25 À : anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net Objet : Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 Review Phase Reminder On 2018-02-17 13:25:24 CET, Name wrote: > If they are responsive, then there will be no issue with them validating > their email address. > That's a good reason not to implement "security theater" policy. Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
