Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------------------------

"There is no question that had we been able to
escalate more rapidly, we would have put more pressure
on Serb leadership but it is also true that had we
escalated more rapidly, we would have fractured NATO
and lost."


NATO War Against Serbia Hobbled by Alliance Politics,
GAO Says
By Tony Capaccio

Washington, Aug. 8 (Bloomberg) -- The North Atlantic
Treaty Organization's 1999 war against Serbia may have
been longer than necessary because it violated at
least seven principles of U.S. military doctrine, says
the U.S. General Accounting Office. 

Political leaders' concerns that casualties be limited
and the alliance remain unified plus an expectation
that Serb leaders would crack within days under
minimal pressure led the military to pull punches --
forsaking certain air targets and withholding ground
troops, the congressional audit agency says. 

The GAO report is the first independent U.S.
government assessment of the 78-day air campaign to
stop Slobodan Milosevic's effort to run ethnic
Albanians out of the Serbian province of Kosovo. It
acknowledges the campaign was successful and it
doesn't pass judgment on NATO's political concerns. 

At base, the report is a reminder of the constraints
of coalition warfare, and it notes that the U.S. Joint
Chiefs of Staff and Air Force in particular, have
modified their doctrine to accommodate these new
realities. 

``These concerns will likely weigh as heavily in the
decision- making process as achieving military
objectives,'' it says. ``These operations may not be
conducted as effectively or efficiently as operations
that more closely follow U.S. military doctrine.'' 

The 30-page assessment -- which is slated to be made
public Monday -- was prepared for Representative John
Murtha from Pennsylvania, the ranking Democrat on the
House defense appropriations subcommittee, and House
Armed Services Committee chairman Bob Stump, an
Arizona Republican. 

Clark's Reaction 

NATO's commander during the war, retired Army Gen.
Wesley Clark, agreed with GAO that the Kosovo
operation is a model for the constraints U.S. forces
face in multinational operations. 

But the report paints a misleading picture of the role
politics played in running the Kosovo campaign, Clark
said. 

``It tells the American public that when the war
started `you bad politicians got in the way and didn't
let us military do what we needed,'' Clark said. ``The
simple fact is we won.'' 

``The report is useful but I think we have to be
careful that we don't fall into the trap of taking
politics out of conflict -- you can't and never will
and shouldn't,'' Clark said. 

NATO political leaders weren't responsible for the
alliance's failure to deliver on promises to destroy
Serb forces, Clark said. 

``We had problems striking Serb forces -- the Air
Force needs to work on that,'' Clark said. ``We had
problems taking out Serb air defenses. The Air Force
needs to do more work on that. Neither of those
problems had anything to do with the politicians. I'm
not blaming the commanders. It was beyond their
capability to make the kind of difference I believe
they needed to make,'' he said. 

Seven Departures 

According to the GAO, the campaign departed from the
following principles of U.S. warfare: 

-- starting campaigns with clear military objectives; 

-- using overwhelming force early in a campaign
against vital enemy interests such as command
headquarters, war production facilities and key
support infrastructure; 

-- conducting simultaneous operations against a
variety of targets such as bridges, communications
systems and electric power supplies; 

-- launching air strikes in conjunction with ground
operations to draw out and destroy enemy armor and
mobile forces; 

-- attacking targets in a systematic way to achieve a
clearly defined military or political effect; 

-- approving targets through the military chain of
command instead of through a political process; 

-- setting up a joint command representing the forces
used in combat. 

`Vague and Less Decisive' 

NATO's objectives were ``vague and less decisive'' and
``not easily attainable through military means,'' the
report says. 

The operation's civilian chiefs -- President Bill
Clinton, U.K. Defense Minister George Robertson and
NATO Secretary General Javier Solano -- said the air
strikes were launched to stop Serb forces from driving
Kosovar Albanians from their homes and to impel a
peace. 

``Since the goals of the military action were not to
defeat the Yugoslavian leadership but to get it to
stop the violence and reach a peace agreement, it was
unclear how to achieve the goals with air
operations,'' said GAO. 

Clark didn't agree that the war might have been
shorter had ``overwhelming force'' been used early on
against Serb roads, bridges and electrical power
grids, fuel storage facilities and transportation
networks. 

``NATO believed that if it used minimal force against
Milosevic, there was a chance Milosevic could crack,''
Clark said. ``You couldn't refute that. If you started
your operations with the intent of wiping out Serbia,
you'd be irrational. It wasn't started as a war. There
was some reasonable hope at the outset that Milosevic
would crack.'' 

``There is no question that had we been able to
escalate more rapidly, we would have put more pressure
on the Serb leadership but it is also true that had we
escalated more rapidly, we would have fractured NATO
and lost,'' he said. 
 
 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

-------------------------------------------------
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [email protected]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



Reply via email to