Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------------------------

[The former King Michael, who is demanding his
family's Hohenzollern castle be returned to him, had,
while living in Britain several years ago, actively
campaigned for NATO expansion - long before it became
the vogue among European elites. To read his speech in
London on the subject, see
http://mae.kappa.ro/wbrn/a/a6.html] 


Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
August 29, 2001

Romania: Parliament Extends Controversial Restitution
Law
By Eugen Tomiuc

Romania's parliament today approved a three-month
extension to a property restitution law that came into
force earlier this year. The approval came despite
opposition from ultranationalist lawmakers, who say
the high number of claims from descendants of noble
families -- including a lawsuit by Romania's former
monarch, Michael -- will "endanger" Romania's national
security. RFE/RL correspondent Eugen Tomiuc reports: 

Prague, 29 August 2001 (RFE/RL) -- Romania's lower
house of parliament today extended by three months the
deadline for submitting property restitution claims,
after the Senate approved the extension earlier this
week.

A restitution law adopted earlier this year (January)
provided for claims to be submitted no later than 15
August, but Romania's government -- faced with a
record number of high-profile claims -- decided to ask
parliament for an extension of the deadline.

The government's decision came as Romanians who reside
abroad complained they were unaware of the restitution
law or had not had enough time to prepare their
claims. 

But it was an especially high-profile claim earlier
this month (7 August) by King Michael -- Romania's
former monarch -- for the return of a 19th-century
castle that triggered a wave of property restitution
demands.

King Michael is seeking the return of properties in
the southern Carpathians, including Peles Castle, a
former summer residence that was seized by communists
after Michael's forced abdication in 1947.

But Peles -- a beautiful castle dating from the 1870s
-- is also the most popular museum in Romania, and
some officials in the Social Democratic government
have said the castle may not be returned.

Peles was built by Romania's first king, Charles I of
Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, and had already been
partially turned into a museum during his rule.
Communists kept parts of the Peles museum open until
the early 1970s, when late dictator Nicolae Ceausescu
closed the museum and turned the palace into a
personal residence.

The museum was reopened for the public after the 1989
popular revolt that toppled Ceausescu's regime. 

Michael's attempt to regain his castle sparked
criticism from ultranationalist politicians, members
of the governing Social Democratic Party and some
journalists. Several newspapers have launched a media
campaign against Michael's claims, accusing him of
greed and what they call a "lack of patriotism."

But the former monarch's lawyer, Adrian Vasiliu, tells
RFE/RL that Michael wants to leave the castle under
the state's administration provided that the
government gives him moral reparation and officially
recognizes him as the rightful owner.

"The king never intended to use the castle for
himself, but to leave it perpetually in the
administration of the Romanian government, with all
the results -- which include collecting the income
generated by the [Peles] museum. But morally, there is
a basic condition which the King cannot renounce: the
government must officially and legally recognize that
the [Peles] domain, including the castle, have been
and are his majesty's rightful properties."

The government earlier this year mended its
relationship with Michael after a decade of animosity.
President Ion Iliescu in May formally invited the king
to visit Romania and subsequently met with him in
Bucharest. 

Vasiliu says Michael's relations with both Iliescu and
Prime Minister Adrian Nastase are as good as ever,
despite the irritation shown by some government
officials toward the former monarch's claims:

"There are cordial relations, I should say, between
the king and President Ion Iliescu, and between the
king and Prime Minister Adrian Nastase. These two
important political figures have never made any
personal statements regarding the royal claims."

Professor Alexandru Zub, a renowned historian
specializing in Romanian history, says the
government's reconciliation with the king was meant
more to improve its image abroad than because of a
genuine interest in solving the restitution problem.

Zub says, though, that the royal claims are in
accordance with the restitution law.

"I would like to stress, first of all, the king's
right to repossess his properties, and secondly, the
need to avoid treating these things as being something
other than what they are -- an issue to be settled
according to the existing law."

A spate of other high-profile claims followed the
former king's demand. Two weeks ago, the descendants
of Michael's aunt, Princess Ileana, demanded the
return of Bran Castle -- a 13th-century fortress built
by Teutonic knights in southern Transylvania and known
as "Dracula's Castle."

Among the more unusual claims is that of Gheorghe
Popescu, an 80-year-old Romanian who is asking for the
return of a 14th-century Transylvanian castle that
used to belong to the Hungarian noble family of the
Corvins. Popescu, who says he has documents to prove
he is a Corvin himself, also wants the noble family's
estate, which during the Middle Ages consisted of a
huge chunk of central Transylvania. 

Other demands come either from descendants of noble
Romanian landowners who want their manors back or from
the heirs of prewar industrialists.

The unexpected number of requests caught the
authorities by surprise, prompting one government
official to say that if "one-third of the country" is
to be claimed, the parliament may have to intervene. 

Newspapers conducted opinion polls to show the lack of
public support for the royal claims, while the
ultranationalist Greater Romania Party (PRM) -- which
holds a fourth of the seats in parliament -- demanded
this week that the restitution law become the subject
of a national referendum. 

The PRM also demanded that Romania's Intelligence
Service (SRI) come up with a report assessing the
impact of the restitution law on the country's
national security, and PRM leader Corneliu Vadim Tudor
said the restitution law must be destroyed "before it
destroys us." 

The government has not yet given a response to the
former king's claims. Government spokesman Claudiu
Lucaci says authorities have begun assessing the royal
claims based on documents and on the restitution law. 

Lucaci told our correspondent that the government
agreed in principle to conduct negotiations with
Michael. But he said talks will take place only after
officials complete their analysis of the case. 

"It was the former monarch who proposed negotiations,
and the government agreed. But it remains to be seen
when these negotiations will effectively begin, since
we first have to complete the analysis of the case." 

Adrian Vasiliu, the king's lawyer, says Michael might
appeal to the European Court of Human Rights. But he
says the former king would like to avoid taking that
step.

Meanwhile, many former owners of small properties who
are now engaged in legal battles in courts are
awaiting the outcome. They know their own claims might
well depend on whether the restitution law will be
properly applied to this much-publicized case.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

-------------------------------------------------
This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been 
shut down

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [email protected]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



Reply via email to