HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK ---------------------------
. . Matter in Motion through Space and Time ... http://www.egroups.com/group/Communist-Internet ] [Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] . . ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:11 PM Subject: [kominform2] China. People�s Daily Apr 27 Extracts. Saudi Arabia Warns US on Mideast Policy. Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz warned US President George W. Bush on Thursday about the risks the United States faces if it continues with a Middle East policy widely perceived in the Arab world as favoring Israel, a senior Saudi official said. Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz warned US President George W. Bush on Thursday about the risks the United States faces if it continues with a Middle East policy widely perceived in the Arab world as favoring Israel, a senior Saudi official said. Abdullah and Bush met for about five hours at Bush's ranch in Crowford, Texas, two hours longer than the original plan. Adel Al-Jubeir, a foreign policy adviser to the Saudi government, told reporters Abdullah had warned Bush about the direction of U.S. policy in the Middle East. "The crown prince speaks directly, he is sincere and he doesn'tmince words," Al-Jubeir said. "The message is, if the violence doenot diminish, there will be grave consequences for the U.S. and its interests in the region." Al-Jubeir said Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon must withdraw Israeli troops from Palestinian cities and towns, end thesieges of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat at Ramallah and around the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, and submit to a swift U.N.fact-finding mission in Jenin. Bush on Thursday urged Israel to finish its troop withdrawal from Palestinian lands and seek a "non-violent" solution to armed standoffs in Ramallah and Bethlehem. "Israel must finish its withdrawal," Bush said after the long meeting with the Saudi leader. "I made it clear to him I expected Israel to withdraw. ... I expect them to be finished." Bush said that he and Crown Prince Abdullah had forged a "strong personal bond" through the talks, which was dominated by the Israeli-Palestinian crisis. "One of the really positive things out of this meeting is the fact the crown prince and I established a strong personal bond," Bush said. The two sides discussed next steps in implementing a Saudi peace plan which was endorsed by the Arab league, Bush said, describing the plan as "a breakthrough" in defusing the Mideast crisis. The crown prince left the ranch in Crowford without speaking to reporters. Saudi Arabia recently complained that the Bush administration'ssupport of Israel had damaged prospects for the Middle East peace process and soured relations with the Arab world. According to Bush, Crown Prince Abdullah promised during the meeting that the country will not support any broadening of Iraq 'soil embargo to include other angry Arab states. "Saudi Arabia made it clear and made it clear publicly that they will not use oil as a weapon and I appreciate that, respect that and expect that to be the case," Bush said. Bush Urges Israel to Complete Troop Withdrawal US President George W. Bush on Thursday urged Israel to finish its troop withdrawal from the Palestinian territories and seek a "non-violent" solution to armedstandoffs in Ramallah and Bethlehem. "Israel must finish its withdrawal," Bush said after a long meeting with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz at his Texas ranch. "I made it clear to him I expected Israel to withdraw. ... I expect them to be finished,'' Bush said. The talks began in the morning and lasted about five hours, twohours longer than original plans, according to the White House. Bush said that he and Crown Prince Abdullah had forged a "strong personal bond" through the talks, which was dominated by the Israeli-Palestinian crisis. "One of the really positive things out of this meeting is the fact the crown prince and I established a strong personal bond," Bush said. The two sides discussed next steps in implementing a Saudi peace plan which was endorsed by the Arab League, Bush said, describing the plan as "a breakthrough" in solving the Middle Eastcrisis. The crown prince left the ranch in Crowford without speaking toreporters. Saudi Arabia recently complained that the Bush administration'ssupport of Israel had damaged prospects for the Middle East peace process and soured relations with the Arab world. According to Bush, Crown Prince Abdullah promised during the meeting that the country will not support any broadening of Iraq'soil embargo to include other angry Arab states. "Saudi Arabia made it clear and made it clear publicly that they will not use oil as a weapon and I appreciate that, respect that and expect that to be the case," Bush said. **** Russian President Putin to Visit China, Boosting Links. Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit China later this year as part of a series of meetings with his Chinese counterpart Jiang Zemin that will boost cooperation between the two countries, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Thursday. Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit China later this year as part of a series of meetings with his Chinese counterpart Jiang Zemin hat will boost cooperation between the two countries, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said Thursday. "Before the end of the year, President Putin will make a visit to China. The date has still to be decided," Ivanov said after talks in Moscow with Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan. Putin and Jiang are also to meet in June, at a summit in Saint Petersburg of leaders from the six member states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), and in October at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, Ivanov added. "I am sure this will give extra impetus to the development of relations between our two countries," the Russian foreign minister said. Ivanov said Russia and China placed great importance on the SCO, and envisage "setting up anti-terrorist structures" within its framework, adding that the body "will play an important role in safeguarding regional stability." Tang Jiaxuan said that the SCO "was the first organisation among all international bodies to respond with an initiative to fight the evil of terrorism" in the wake of last September's terrorist attacks on the United States . A foreign ministers' meeting of the SCO, which comprises China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, was due to be held in Moscow on Friday. The Shanghai group was formally established in June 2000, when Uzbekistan joined the existing "Shanghai Five" which had met annually since 1996. **** Chinese, Russian Foreign Ministers Meet to Strengthen Bilateral Ties. Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan and his Russian counterpart Igor Ivanov held talks Thursday in Moscow on the bilateral relations and the international issues of common interest. The two ministers signed a bilateral consular pact aimed at better protection of the rights and interests of China and Russia and that of the citizens of the two nations. Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan and his Russian counterpart Igor Ivanov held talks Thursday in Moscow on the bilateral relations and the international issues of common interest. The two ministers signed a bilateral consular pact at the end of their talks, saying that the signing of this new agreement is another concrete step forward to the implementation of the Good- Neighborly Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation, signed by presidents of the two countries last July. The agreement is aimed at better protection of the rights and interests of China and Russia and that of the citizens of the two nations, they said. During the talks, Tang and Ivanov voiced their satisfaction on the smooth development of the strategic cooperative partnership between the two countries, they both agreed that increased mutual trust in the political field, closer strategic coordination and comprehensive bilateral cooperation in all fields will not only be in keeping with the fundamental interests of the two countries, but also be conducive to peace, security and stability of the world as a whole. The Chinese and Russian presidents are expected to hold several meetings, and the prime ministers of the two countries plan to hold talks this year, they said, adding those high-level contacts will be of great significance for pushing forward the bilateral ties. The two countries will cooperate closely for the success of the meetings and talks, they said. Tang is in Moscow to attend the ministerial meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), scheduled for Friday. The two ministers also exchanged views on the preparations for the SCO summit, to be held in May in the Russian city of St. Petersburg. They maintained that the development in regional and international situation has called for a greater role of SCO, which groups China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. **** Be Vigilant against 'New Empire Theory'. Recently, around the time when the US dished out the "Theory of Defeated Nations", External Policy Advisor of British PM Tony Blair published his fantastic talks, which advocate saving the world with new imperialism. Recently, around the time when the US government dished out the "Theory of Defeated Nations", External Policy Advisor Robert Kubo of British Prime Minister Tony Blair published in the British paper, Observer, his fantastic talks, which advocate saving the world with new imperialism. Exactly the same as past colonialism and imperialism which needed to find an excuse for colonization and aggression and expansion, modern power politics and new interventionism also need a certain kind of theoretical packing and the creation of public opinion. This clamor for the self-styled "longing for new empire", which puts a fashioned cloak on the mummy of old colonialism and divides the world into three types of country groups: The first type are "front modern countries" composed of Somali, Afghanistan and other former colonial countries; the second type are "rear empires and rear modern countries" composed of former colonizers; the third type are "traditional countries" made up of China, India, Pakistan and some other countries. In brief, the "new empire theory" maintains that the defeated country group formed by former colonies are the breeding grounds of turmoil and threat, it stands for the use of the means of new colonization, thinking it is acceptable for "rear empire" to export stability and freedom abroad. The "new empire theory", based on colonialist concept and logic, advocates that the rear modern country group should be accustomed to double standards, i.e., they should guarantee security through law and cooperation within themselves, whereas in dealing with former colonial countries outside Europe, they should adopt the previous century jungle law-force, preemptive attack, deception, as well as any methods needed for dealing with those countries still living in the 19th century. Moreover, the "new empire theory" lists many developing countries in the "defeated countries" group that endanger world security and stability, claiming that these countries have lost the legality of using force. To give green light to new imperialist military intervention, the "new empire theory" gives farfetched footnotes that making Afghan warfare serve as "defensive imperialism" is "understandable". The "new empire theory" sums up the European union as "voluntary imperialism", asserting that the rear modern European union has offered a "cooperative empire" prospect, sticking the label "voluntary global economic imperialism" on the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. On the other hand, in order to legalize the new empire group's intervention in the affairs of nearby regions, the "new empire theory" fabricates the concept of "neighboring country imperialism". This theory is based on the war chaos and instability of the Balkan region, thinking that the rear modern country group not only should send out peace-keeping and international protection forces, but also should provide police, judges, chief wardens, bankers, etc., at the same time, they should supervise and organize election. To put it plainly, if only they rely on the creed of "neighboring country imperialism", the new empire group can more unscrupulously interfere in the regional affairs of neighboring countries, including even toppling the regime of a country and changing its social system. Obviously, the essence of the "new empire theory" aims to clear the way for power politics in the new age, it runs counter to the trend of the establishment of a just and reasonable international new political order. If the hegemonic logic and jungle law featuring the "new empire theory" is acted upon, the world will be thrown into utter disorder, the norms of international law centered on State sovereignty, territorial integrity and national dignity will be wantonly trampled upon, the unilateralism and new interventionism pursued by certain countries and country groups will be running wild. After the human society entered into the 21st century wherein peace and development are stressed, the fact that the "defeated nation theory" and the "new empire theory" echo each other should arouse the full vigilance of the international community. **** Where Lie the Mistakes of Bush's Policy Toward Taiwan. Highlights: After the "September 11" incident, Washington did not cease its arms sale to Taiwan and its promotion of US-Taiwan military relationship. This relationship is developing in the direction toward openness, high level and mechanism. *After the "September 11" incident, Washington did not cease its arms sale to Taiwan and its promotion of US-Taiwan military relationship. This relationship is developing in the direction toward openness, high level and mechanism. The US Asia-Pacific strategy is built on the basis of a wrong judgment of the regional situation. Although security concern over the Asia-Pacific region perhaps will never be disappear, for most of regional members, however, economic development remains the most priority and most important point of attention. *US right-wing forces again attempt to redefine the Taiwan issue as the geographical and political antagonistic focus of China and the United States, thereby renewing the Americanization of the issue. This has not only shaken the most important cornerstone of bilateral relations since 1972, but has made the Taiwan issue more complicated, it has all the more made the United States shoulder an extremely heavy load. ------ Since President George W. Bush assumed office in the White House, the Taiwan issue has again become a touchstone for examining US policy toward China. The Clinton administration, especially during its second term of tenure, advocated that the best method for keeping in contact with a rising China was to conduct constructive contacts, so as to make China merge into the international community and turn it into a cooperative partner in regional and international affairs, and the peaceful solution of the Taiwan issue would help the United States to achieve the above-mentioned strategic goal. President Clinton not only expressed in 1997, during President Jiang Zemin's visit to the United States, his hope for an early solution to the Taiwan question, but also in 1998, during his trip to China, openly expounded US "three-no" commitments (not supporting Taiwan independence and "two-China" or "one China or one Taiwan", nor supporting Taiwan's participation in the international organizations of sovereign states). The Clinton administration also assumed a positive posture toward the resumption of dialogs between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits. Proceeding from the thinking of American realism, the Bush administration fears that the rise of China's strength would change the balance of forces in the Asia-Pacific region and challenge American interests, therefore it advocates "containing China's strength and its ambition as expressed in security while activating China's domestic transformation through economic exchange". Taiwan is regarded as a useful card for America to realize this goal. Rediscovering Taiwan's Strategic Value Approaching questions from a historical angle, the American understanding of the strategic importance of Taiwan changes with the change in the US Asia-Pacific regional strategy. In the 1950s-1960s, one of the main tasks of US Asia-Pacific regional strategy was to contain China, therefore Taiwan was regarded as an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of the United States in the Far East. During the 70s, as China and the United States were moving toward conciliation, the focus of the US Asia-Pacific regional strategy was readjusted into one of making use of the "China factor" to restrain Soviet expansion in Asia. Given this situation, the strategic importance of Taiwan for the United States sharply declined, Washington severed its diplomatic ties with Taipei and promised to pursue the "one China" policy. But along with the conclusion of the Cold War, the international pattern experienced a major change and, with the rise of China, US right-wing forces rediscovered the strategic value of Taiwan. In their eyes, this value is manifest mainly in the following two aspects: First, as the sole global superpower and a country holding a dominant position in the Asia-Pacific region, the United States is devoted to maintaining the existing Asia-Pacific security order, while the separate state between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits is an important component part of the present Asia-Pacific pattern. China's effort to reunify Taiwan with the mainland is seen as a challenge to the status quo, the United States therefore wants to show its intransigent stand on this "crucial" issue in order to hold back China. Second, from a long-term of view, the most important security challenge facing the United States in the Asia-Pacific region will be the change in the balance of forces resulted from the rise of China's strength. But as long as the two sides of the Taiwan Straits remain in a separate state, a considerable portion of China's strength and the growth of its resources will be assimilated and absorbed by the Taiwan issue, this will effectively prevent China from possessing the ability to carry out geographical and political competition with the United States in the region. The above-mentioned viewpoints are fully reflected in the "Four-Year Defense Evaluation Report" published by the Pentagon last September. If China were the main military competitor with the United States as noted in the report, Taiwan should be seen as part of the US "sphere of influence", then what does it imply in the US Asia-Pacific security policy? First, Washington will adjust the military deployment of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region, so as make full preparation for launching a large-scale military competition with China. According to Commander-in-Chief Admiral Dennis Cutler Blair who is going to be relieved of his office, in July 2002, the US forces will deploy in Guam three additional "Los Angeles-grade" nuclear-powered submarines capable of launching cruise missiles and store in there interceptor missiles that can assist Taiwan in "self-defense". Second, the United States will "help Taiwan in self-defense" through providing the latter with advanced weapon systems and intensifying the US-Taiwan defense relations. Since the Bush administration took office, Washington has become more unscrupulous in the aspects of arms sale to Taiwan and US-Taiwan military ties, and become more inclined to regarding Taiwan as a de facto security ally. Even after the "September 11" attacks, Washington did not cease its arms sale to Taiwan and stop advancing US-Taiwan military relations. Taiwan's "defense minister" Tang Yiau-min's America visit this March and his meeting with senior officials of the Bush administration broke through the restriction on US-Taiwan military ties since the establishment of China-US diplomatic relations. This fact shows that US-Taiwan military relationship is developing in the direction toward openness, high level and mechanism. Vice-defense minister Paul Wolfowitz, a hawker in the Bush administration, vowed to Taiwan that the United States would try its utmost to help Taiwan in resisting "attacks" from the mainland. Third, the United States will further intensify security cooperation between regional allies, in the hope of forming a more effective strategic network to cope with the rising China. It should be noted that what the "Four-year Defense Evaluation" report reflects are mainly the opinions of the Pentagon which does not necessarily fully represent the policy of the entire Bush administration. However, this does not at all mean that the importance of this report can be overlooked. In fact, what this report reflects are precisely three striking tendencies of the Bush administration's Asia-Pacific policy. First is its pro-Taiwan tendency. In order to emphasize the current administration's pro-Taiwan stand, Bush has opened two precedents in one year. In April 2001, Bush openly declared that the United States would adopt all necessary means to help Taiwan's "self-defense", This is the first time the US president made known his stand since the establishment of China-US diplomatic relations. In February 2002, during his visit to Beijing <http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/province/beijing.html> , Bush openly stressed that the United States would continue to support the "Taiwan Relations Act". This is the first time the US leader openly made such a statement during his China visit since 1979. Second, Strengthening military and political support to Taiwan through selling large quantities of sophisticated weapons and developing close military relations, as well as raising Taiwan's "international visibility". The events from the arms sales worth US$4 billion to Taiwan in April 2001, to the "courteous reception" granted to Chen Shui-bian in transit to the United States, and to its support for Taiwan joining the "World Health Organization" (WHO), as well as Tang Yiau-min's trip to the United States, all these events, without exception, are a reflection of this tendency. Third, keeping a close watch over China which is undergoing rapid development and trying to develop close defense and diplomatic ties with China's potential antagonistic countries in Asia. Over the past year and more, the unusual warmth of US-Indian relationship is obviously inseparable from the China factor. Mistaken Thinking Viewed from the angle of East Asia and non-America, there exist many mistakes in Bush administration's Asia-Pacific security strategy and its policy toward Taiwan. First, The US Asia-Pacific strategy is built on the basis of misjudgment of the regional situation. Although security concern in the Asia-Pacific region will never disappear, for the majority of regional members, economic development remains the most priority and most important point of concern. Although some East Asian countries have from time to time expressed their worries about the ever-stronger China, their worries, however, are expressed mostly in respect to economy and not to security. In comparison, Washington seems to be more concerned about security, this is mainly because the United States intends the maintain its leading position in the Asia-Pacific region, whereas the rise of China poses a challenge to its effort to realize this goal. Second, the Bush administration's stand on its Taiwan policy is contrary to the general trend of the development of cross-Strait relations and its ignoring the changing agent on the Taiwan issue. Before 1979, the Chinese mainland insisted on "liberating Taiwan" by force and finally realizing national reunification, the Taiwan issue was manifest mainly cross-Strait military confrontation. After 1979, the mainland set forth the "peaceful reunification, and one country, two systems" policy, calling for solution of differences between the two sides through political negotiation, the Taiwan question has largely become a political issue between Beijing and Taipei. When Lee Teng-hui was in power and after Chen Shui-bian took office, they both refuse to accept the "one China" principle, thus diminishing the possibility for political peace talks between the two sides of the Straits, but the ever-closer interactions in the economic field between the two sides have formed a new motive force and, from the long-term point of view, a constructive framework has been established for the proper solution of the Taiwan issue. However, current US practice of continuously arming Taiwan can only aggravate cross-Strait military confrontation and thus bring the situation onto the track of vicious development, this has puzzled, disappointed and resented globe-wide Chinese who hope for peaceful realization of China's national reunification. Americanizing the Taiwan issue is another mistaken view of those who advocate implementation of a policy of partial containment of China on the issue of Taiwan. All through the time from the entry of US Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Straits in 1950 to Nixon's China visit in 1972, the Taiwan issue had all along been a symbol of China-American confrontation and the crux of bilateral relations. After Nixon's historic China trip in 1972, the United States tried to define the Taiwan issue as a question between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits and not as between China and the United States. The United States reiterated its concern for solving the Taiwan issue peacefully by the Chinese themselves. The above-said stand had not only promoted the development of China-US relations, but had played a positive role in stabilizing the situation in the Taiwan Straits and improving cross-Strait relations. However, under the new historical conditions, the US right-wing forces again attempt to redefine the Taiwan issue as the focus of China-US geographical and political antagonism, and thus renewed the Americanization of this question. This has not only shaken the most important cornerstone of the bilateral relationship established since1972, but has made the Taiwan issue more complicated, it has all the more made the United States shoulder an extremely heavy load in East Asia. People may ask: Is it that the Bush administration is not aware of the weight of the Taiwan issue in the hearts of the Chinese, and that they don't understand the great elevation of US-Taiwan ties will harm China-US relations? The Bush administration does not think so. It tends to believe that because China's current priority concerns are economic development and social stability, therefore it is not possible to fall out with the United States for the Taiwan issue, so as to avoid endangering its exports to the United States, which are vitally important for China's economic growth. Given this, the United States will be able to take big strides forward to develop US-Taiwan relations, and in the meantime to continue doing business with China's mainland. People want to see how long will Washington's wishful thinking last. **** Forum Opposing Falun Gong Cult Held at Sacred Buddhist Site. Religious figures and representatives of groups opposing Falun Gong have held a forum to discuss the cult. The cult severely profaned the spirit of Buddhism and upset all Buddhist disciples, said Shenghui, deputy director of the Buddhist Association of China. Religious figures and representatives of groups opposing Falun Gong have held a forum to discuss the cult. Master Shenghui, deputy director of the Buddhist Association of China said this is the first time a sacred Buddhist site has been chosen for a forum on the Falun Gong Cult. Explaining the difference between Buddhism and the Falun Gong cult, he said Li Hongzhi, ringleader of the cult, plagiarized Buddhist terms to concoct his "Fa Lun Da Fa" which misled ordinary people, defrauded people of their money and even took practitioners' lives. The cult severely profaned the spirit of Buddhism and upset all Buddhist disciples, he added. The forum sponsored by the China Anti-Cult Association also focused on such topics as the relationship between freedom of religion and the policy of cracking down on the cult, as well as religion's role in stamping out evil cults. China's Buddhist society was the first to oppose Falun Gong. As early as 1996, Zhao Puchu, the late director of the Buddhist Association of China, said Falun Gong was an evil cult. _________________________________________________ KOMINFORM P.O. Box 66 00841 Helsinki Phone +358-40-7177941 Fax +358-9-7591081 http://www.kominf.pp.fi General class struggle news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Geopolitical news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Katsauksia suomeksi: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Stock for $4 and no minimums. FREE Money 2002. http://us.click.yahoo.com/k6cvND/n97DAA/ySSFAA/VL0olB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Peruuta ryhm�n tilaus l�hett�m�ll� s�hk�postia osoitteeseen: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------- ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
