Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 19:24:14 -0400
To:
From: "Bob Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Block Address  | Add to Address Book
Subject: Killing is legal if you are white or American.

Killing is legal if you are white or
American. Otherwise, it is illegal

U.S. demands exemption for U.S. soldiers
before the International Criminal Court.

Britain and France also seek exemptions for their
soldiers serving as peacekeepers in Afghanistan.


Globe and Mail, June 22, 2002 � Page A16 


Canada, other allies blast immunity push
Bush administration wants peacekeepers
shielded from prosecutions of war crimes


By PAUL KORING

WASHINGTON -- Washington's efforts to shield U.S. soldiers on UN 
peacekeeping missions from being hauled before the International
Criminal Court are opposed by Canada and other U.S. allies.

"We urge the Security Council to reject the U.S. proposals," Foreign 
Affairs spokeswoman Nancy Bergeron said yesterday in Ottawa as U.S. diplomats 
at the United Nations attempted to win support for a resolution giving their 
soldiers blanket immunity from war-crimes charges.

Fears that U.S. President George W. Bush's administration will recall 
its peacekeepers in the Balkans and elsewhere eased yesterday when a vote 
on renewing the Bosnian civil-police mandate was deferred. But the issue 
seems likely to bedevil relations between Washington and its closest allies, 
with Mr. Bush's government seeking military help in its war against 
international terrorism at the same time it demands that U.S. soldiers receive 
special treatment by the international court.

Washington has also asked the governments of Bosnia and East Timor to 
grant U.S. peacekeeping personnel exemption from prosecution, which host 
countries are allowed to do under the treaty creating the court.

Britain and France, strong proponents of the court, also have sought 
exemptions for their soldiers serving as peacekeepers in Afghanistan, 
part of a profusion of double standards and exemptions threatening to 
overshadow the court, to be based at The Hague, the Netherlands.

(The court officially comes into being on July 1, but it isn't expected 
to be operating until next year.)

It remains unclear why countries need exemptions if they are willing to 
prosecute their own soldiers for alleged crimes.

The treaty establishing the court gives signatories the primary right 
to prosecute if they are "able and willing."

But senior U.S. officials said that they fear the court might attempt 
to enforce jurisdiction.

"We ought to be exempt from that so there isn't that kind of political 
harassment that can take place unfairly, particularly when you know 
you're fighting the global war on terror," U.S. Defence Secretary Donald 
Rumsfeld said yesterday.

Ottawa, a staunch supporter of the ICC, believes that no Canadian 
troops would face prosecution, because they would first face criminal or 
disciplinary procedures under Canadian military justice.

"I'm confident [that] in the case of any actions that were improper in 
military matters, any of our troops would be prosecuted by our own 
courts," Foreign Minister Bill Graham recently said.

Mr. Bush's administration, by comparison, is waging a three-pronged 
assault against the International Criminal Court, the first permanent tribunal 
to prosecute war crimes, including that of genocide.

First, it renounced former U.S. president Bill Clinton's signature on 
the treaty.
Then it sought specific exemptions from countries hosting UN 
peacekeeping missions where U.S. personnel are serving.

Finally, it has drafted a UN Security Council resolution that would 
grant U.S. troops immunity from prosecution by the ICC while serving on UN 
missions.

The Security Council resolution won't be considered until later this 
month, but it is expected to face stiff opposition.

Three of the five permanent Security Council member states -- Britain, 
France and Russia -- have signed the ICC treaty. The fourth, China, has 
yet to sign but has opposed a U.S. exemption.

� 2002 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



        .............................................
        Bob Olsen   Toronto   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        .............................................




Do You Yahoo!?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup

Reply via email to