HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?art_id=22543670

The Times of India
September 18, 2002


US, Russia differ over inspectors for Iraq 


-"From our standpoint, we don't need any special
resolution," Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said. "All
of the necessary resolutions are to hand."
"What procedures they should follow, well we know
those too. All of these matters were agreed to during
the preliminary inspections (in the 1990s)," he added.




UNITED NATIONS (Reuters): Russia and the United States
clashed openly on Tuesday over whether the United
Nations must give arms inspectors stronger powers as
Iraqi and UN experts kicked off talks on the mechanics
of allowing the inspectors to resume a task abandoned
nearly four years ago.


The disagreement, at a news conference at UN
headquarters in New York, suggested that Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein has started to make cracks in
the broad consensus against him by backing down when
faced with the threat of US attack.


It also revealed a split between those governments
whose main concern is to avert a US attack on Iraq and
those who believe the priority is to disarm Iraq at
any cost.


US President George W Bush said the UN Security
Council "must not be fooled" by Iraq's offer, while
the Pentagon planned for possible war and arms
inspectors, responsible for checking Iraq for nuclear,
chemical, biological and ballistic weapons, prepared
to return.


Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix met top Iraqi
arms experts on Tuesday briefly to discuss the
inspectors' readmission. The two sides will meet again
in Vienna during the week of September 30. A precise
date has not been set.


Bush told the United Nations last Thursday it should
no longer allow Iraq to defy resolutions dating back
to the 1991 Gulf War, particularly those on weapons of
mass destruction.


Iraq responded on Monday with an unconditional offer
to readmit inspectors. They left Iraq in December 1998
on the eve of US-British bombing raids to punish
Baghdad for alleged non-cooperation and have not been
permitted to return.


UN inspectors who did go into Iraq during the 1990s
complained of hindrance and deceit by the Iraqis,
while Baghdad accused them of spying for the United
States.


The government in Baghdad said its offer had robbed
the United States of any reason to wage war. Iraqis in
the street welcomed their government's sudden shift,
but some feared it would not stop the United States
from attacking.


World oil prices fell on Tuesday as traders' fears of
imminent military action receded. International
benchmark Brent crude oil fell 55 cents to $27.97 a
barrel.


Is the Iraqi offer enough?


The focus at the United Nations on Tuesday was whether
the Iraqi offer had removed the need for a new
resolution to give the inspectors new and stronger
powers.


Russia, one of five council members with veto power,
told the news conference that the Iraqi offer made
further action by the Security Council unnecessary at
this stage and that the inspectors did not need
additional instructions.


"From our standpoint, we don't need any special
resolution," Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said. "All
of the necessary resolutions are to hand."


"What procedures they should follow, well we know
those too. All of these matters were agreed to during
the preliminary inspections (in the 1990s)," he added.


But Bush was adamant, saying: "The Security Council
must act, must act in a way to hold this regime to
account, must not be fooled, must be relevant to keep
the peace."


The Bush administration, which wants to get rid of
Saddam and does not trust Iraqi promises, said it
wanted a Security Council resolution spelling out
Iraq's obligations and stating the consequences for
failure to comply.


"The only way to make sure it is not business as usual
and to make sure it is not a repeat of the past ... is
to put it in the form of a new UN resolution," US
Secretary of State Colin Powell told the news
conference in New York.


"It's quite appropriate ... for the Security Council
to consider the circumstances under which they might
return, what they must be free to do, what additional
instructions may be appropriate," Powell added.


Canada backed the US position but Egypt and France
tended toward the Russian position. The European Union
and the United Nations adopted stances midway between
the two.


In Paris, a French diplomatic source said France would
be willing to discuss a new Security Council
resolution as long as the resolution would not be
divisive.


Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher of Egypt, part of an Arab
consensus against military action against Iraq, said:
"Now there is a way to resume the inspections. In
light of this, I don't understand the point of going
to the Security Council."


Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Moeller, whose
country has the presidency of the European Union, was
wary of the Iraqi offer, conveyed in a letter from its
foreign minister, Naji Sabri, to UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan on Monday.


Pentagon war plans


As the diplomatic wrangle progressed, Washington's war
planning marched ahead.


The United States is discussing with Britain the
possibility of basing B-2 stealth bombers on the
British Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia and the
military is proceeding with plans to send much of its
key Central Command staff to Qatar for an exercise.


"We've seen this before. The Iraqis are masters of the
stop-and-start," one US official said. "If we stopped
every time they started, we would never end their WMD
(weapons of mass destruction) programme."


Israel's army chief said on Tuesday Baghdad's offer
for an unconditional return of UN arms inspectors had
not changed Israeli preparations for a possible US
attack on Iraq.


"We are still working under the assumption something
will happen, and therefore we have to get ready,"
Lieutenant-General Moshe Yaalon said. "From what I can
see, there is a very determined American decision to
achieve in any way the goals the United States has set
from the start," he said.


At the United Nations meeting, UN weapons inspectors
and Iraq's top arms experts discussed how to address
logistic issues on offices, flights, escorts and other
planning. There was no word on when the inspectors
would return.


Iraqi officials also agreed to consider national
legislation prohibiting weapons of mass destruction
activities, as required by UN resolutions, and to
catch up on declarations of changes in former weapons
sites that were under UN monitoring, a statement from
Blix said.


Inspectors prepare


Iraq has not submitted declarations, required twice a
year, since the inspectors were pulled out of Iraq in
December 1998.


Blix conferred with Hasam Mohammed Amin, head of the
Iraqi National Monitoring Directorate, the office used
for liaison with UN inspectors, and Saeed Hasan, a
Foreign Minister official, who was Baghdad's former UN
ambassador.


In a related development, the Security Council asked
current president, Bulgarian Ambassador Stefan Tafrov,
to arrange a council meeting with Blix as soon as
possible.


Blix has a staff of 63 in New York, some of whom could
go to Baghdad quickly to analyze Iraq's chemical,
biological and missile programmes. Two hundred trained
experts from 44 nations are on call and could be put
to work within weeks.


In Washington, US Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle,
a South Dakota Democrat, said on Tuesday he expected
Congress to vote on a resolution on Iraq before the
November 5 Congressional election as Bush has
requested.


A number of Democrats had pushed to put off voting on
a resolution that, if passed, would authorise Bush to
use force against Iraq. Democrats wanted to wait until
after the election, which will decide whether
Republicans keep control of the House of
Representatives and the Democrats the Senate. 
 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to