The key to your question was: "and it occurred to me that ANTLR does not really inspect follow set, it seems to inspect only what's left in the rule itself."
That improvement/bug is what I intend to fix :) Actually, ANTLR v4 lexers will just plain work better (i.e., more like what you expect) ;) Ter On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Marcin Rzeźnicki wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for quick reply. > Anyway, I am not sure whether I understand this RFI you wrote, but if I do > then what I am suggesting is way simpler to implement because the "next token > analysis" part is left to the user. I am not sure whether I see all the > issues clearly. > > 2010/2/16 Terence Parr <[email protected]> > http://www.antlr.org/jira/browse/ANTLR-189 > Ter > On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Marcin Rzeźnicki wrote: > > > > > > -- > Greetings > Marcin Rzeźnicki List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
